Talk About Network

Google





Education > Math > Re: Geometry qu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 14 Topic 4078 of 4365
Post > Topic >>

Re: Geometry question

by hagman <google@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 21, 2008 at 07:47 AM

On 21 Mai, 14:15, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Larry Hewitt wrote:
> > "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:4PfYj.7$N06.5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Jerry Beeler wrote:
> >>> A cylindrical pipe has a radius of 100 inches and a length of 30
> >>> feet. The pipe was run under a road, but, due to an error it had to
be
> >>> removed and dropped 18 inches below it's original position.
>
> >>> What is the volume of the void that is left from the original
> >>> position?
> >>> Note:  This void has to be filled with $200/square yard material so
> >>> I have to be accurate.
>
> >>> Thanks!
>
> >> Are you sure you need to fill up the volume at all?  It sounds to me
> >> like you are thinking that once you dig out the pipe and put a new
> >> one lower down you will have a void where the old pipe was.  But
> >> consider, you are going to have to remove as much material where you
> >> put the pipe lower down.  You are going to have to remove the dirt
> >> where you are going to place the pipe lower down and put it...
> >> somewhere.  So actually when you are done moving the pipe down you
> >> won't have any void.
>
> > Fill removed from the trenching would not be able to be compacted
> > enough to sup****t a road. The void will need to be filled with a
> > grout, cement, or similar material that can flow to fill all cavities.
>
> Well, then your problem is compounded, isn't it?  Because you are going
to
> have to dig down to the pipe to remove it, and aren't going to be able
to
> reuse the fill over it, right?  So you will need to fill with material
all
> the way down to the bottom of the pipe.  Or are you somehow going to be
able
> to reuse the material?
>
> >> --
> >> Jim Langston
> >> tazmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Jim Langston
> tazmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 it's really expensive, some "micro-surgery" might pay out, i.e. you
dig/drill a negligibly small hole down to the pipe, let nanobots
remove 18 inches of material below the pipe; then the pipe is lowered
by 18" and the void above it, which has a volume of 100" x 18" x 30',
is filled through the little hole with that expensive material. If the
hole is thin enough, filling it should be cheap.
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
Geometry question
"Jerry Beeler"   2008-05-18 10:10:05 
Re: Geometry question
bert <bert.hutchings@[  2008-05-18 08:54:51 
Re: Geometry question
bert <bert.hutchings@[  2008-05-18 08:57:25 
Re: Geometry question
Mike <m.fee@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 09:50:38 
Re: Geometry question
William Elliot <marsh@  2008-05-18 21:52:37 
Re: Geometry question
"Jim Langston"   2008-05-19 07:05:21 
Re: Geometry question
Mike <m.fee@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 09:01:40 
Re: Geometry question
"Larry Hewitt"   2008-05-20 16:28:07 
Re: Geometry question
"Jim Langston"   2008-05-21 05:15:04 
Re: Geometry question
"Larry Hewitt"   2008-05-21 20:21:18 
Re: Geometry question
hagman <google@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 07:47:13 
Re: Geometry question
"Larry Hewitt"   2008-05-21 20:22:43 
Re: Geometry question
hagman <google@[EMAIL   2008-05-25 07:11:12 
Re: Geometry question
"[Mr.] Lynn Kurtz&qu  2008-05-20 21:53:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:35:40 PST 2009.