Re: Dimini****ng Returns in Game Engineering

"Geoffrey Summerhayes" <sumrnot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:4ef8316a-56c4-4668-b966-3b166d18079c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jun 16, 12:29 am, "AngleWyrm" <anglew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Nathan Mates" <nat...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

> a*(b+c*d) is not equivalent to a*b*c*d
That's an incorrect assumption. The correct assumption is:
a*(b+c*d) = a*b + a*c*d

>The question is: Can you see why?
I've added a section so that it is quite clear why, called 
Double-Implementation
http://home.comcast.net/~anglewyrm/dimini****ng_returns.htm