On Jun 23, 4:41=A0pm, mike3 <mike4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 22, 9:55=A0pm, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 22, 8:29=A0pm, Rotwang <sg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On 23 Jun, 04:17, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 22, 7:01 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Jun 22, 3:29 pm, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jun 22, 2:50 pm, mike3 <mike4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Without a real demonstration the only assumption that can
rea=
sonably
> > > > > > > be made is your claim Has No Substance To It!!!!!!
>
> > > > > > Why? =A0What would a demonstration prove?
>
> > > > > It would prove that you have something worthwhile.
>
> > > > So what if I don't demonstrate with a factorization of a very
large
> > > > number? =A0What does that prove?
>
> > > It proves that you don't learn from your mistakes.
>
> > Yawn. =A0And you do? =A0If so, why are you replying to me now?
>
> > If I could demonstrate with a large factorization I would have done
> > it.
>
> > I can't.
>
> So you concede that your algorithm is not capable of doing this,
> and so even if it works it is no better than conventional methods?
I said, I can't.
> Thank you.
>
> Concession accepted.
Ok. If that will shut you up, then fine.
This thread was first about my loss of concern about surrogate
factoring and then I decided to hedge a bit by noting that I'd figured
out a way that could give you the odd prime p at the size needed.
My concern was that suddenly there was an easy route popping up, but
now I'm less concerned again.
The issue here is not about whether or not any of you knuckleheads
believe me but whether or not there could be a very fast factoring
method possible from this research that takes the world by complete
surprise.
That's it.
I do not care if I'm wrong. I sleep easier then. I am often wrong.
The exercise here was just a worry burp. I'm less concerned yet again
as I've done some theorizing on the subject and it seems to me that
still there would be low odds of getting the odd prime p that you
need, right?
If not, then, sorry world, I tried. Now I'm off to do other things.
If you want to celebrate my failure then fine. I fail a lot so there
is so much celebrating possible about my failures for people like you.
James Harris
|
