Re: JSH: Dimini****ng concerns on factoring

>> Without a real demonstration the only assumption that can reasonably
>> be made is your claim Has No Substance To It!!!!!!
>
>Why?  What would a demonstration prove?

Your demonstrated lack of proficiency in math is so great that a
third-grade math student rightfully expects to find more good math
in used toilet paper than in anything you write, and expects to get
an "F-", if not expulsion, if she turned in anything you wrote as
homework, and not because of plagiarism.  (No self-respecting third
grader, or for that matter, termite, would claim your stuff as their
own.  On the other hand, a self-respecting third-grade math teacher
might rip her eyes out after reading your stuff.)

Some hints for James Harris:

Don't claim to have "solved the factoring problem" until you can
factor an RSA challenge number.  If you can get anyone to read it,
you might even use an already-factored challenge number if you can
show, step-by-step, how you got your answer, including all the false
steps with the "Pick an odd prime such that James Harris is God"
parts of the procedure.  But factoring a previously unsolved number
will get you the attention you want.

Don't claim to have "solved the factoring problem" until you can
either factor 6 or make sure that your factoring "solution" doesn't
claim to be able to factor 6.  It's really very, very elementary
math to state the range of numbers your proof is valid for.

Don't worry about what "the mathematical community" thinks or doesn't
think about your work.  Worry about your reputation for bad math
with the third-grade student community first.

Don't worry about destroying the world with GOOD math.  But I do
worry about you destroying the world with BAD math, should you ever
get a job that requires it, say, ca****er at McDonalds.