Re: JSH: Dimini****ng concerns on factoring

On 23 Jun, 04:55, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 22, 8:29 pm, Rotwang <sg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 23 Jun, 04:17, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 22, 7:01 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Jun 22, 3:29 pm, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Jun 22, 2:50 pm, mike3 <mike4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Without a real demonstration the only assumption that can
reasonably
> > > > > > be made is your claim Has No Substance To It!!!!!!
>
> > > > > Why?  What would a demonstration prove?
>
> > > > It would prove that you have something worthwhile.
>
> > > So what if I don't demonstrate with a factorization of a very large
> > > number?  What does that prove?
>
> > It proves that you don't learn from your mistakes.
>
> Yawn.  And you do?  If so, why are you replying to me now?

Because I enjoy it. No mistake there as far as I can see. Perhaps you
enjoy spending weeks at a time claiming to have solved the factoring
problem when actually trying your method on a large number would make
it clear that you haven't, but if so then you probably shouldn't keep
making those posts in which you claim to value truth over "social
crap". Unless you enjoy looking like a hypocrite as well.