Re: Would you call this a paradox?

"Frederick Williams" <frederick.williams2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:48622DC9.E2CC8684@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Doug Wedel wrote:
>
>> ineluctably to the conclusion that information is at its maximum in 
>> random
>> numbers.
>
> Let's suppose that the digits of pi are "random", i.e. that pi is
> normal.  Then with an appropriate coding of letters and punctuation
> marks by strings of digits, pi contains all the works of Shakespeare.

In other words, all normal non-repeating transcendentals contain _all_ 
information?

It leaves the definition of "information" entirely untouched.  I was
merely 
asking whether
Shannon and Kolmogorov's definition of "information" led to a paradox.