> So does a lot of math society...
> You people don't get it yet, eh?
*You people*, hey, you better watch yourself buddy....
>
> I go around you, and over time prove to people I'm right, then it's
> not just fun and games in math academia any more.
>
>
You're like those apocalyptic preachers who rant about how the earth
will end on Tuesday and then they're back out there next Friday with
the same crap. You've "preached" about all of these terrible things
that will happen, and which of them has come true so far??? Or should
I ask, has a single one of them come true so far? Since you record is
absolutely nill, you'll have to excuse me if I'm not exactly trembling
in my boots. (Although I have to admit I like the "I go around you"
mantra, James. It's somewhat reminiscent of that line "I drink your
milkshake" from "There will be blood".)
>
> When you can't publish the same old stuff through the same old
> channels. When the Internet is chasing down every bit of wrong math
> that mathematicians push--no matter what their degree or their status
> in the community.
>
They can still publish the same way you publish your crap: online.
See, it works both ways Jimmy.
But I *was* surprised to learn that "the Internet" is going to track
down the *bad math*. Who will these "people of the Internet" be? Can't
be mathematicians, they're the "bad guys". But then who could
understand the math enough to know what was wrong and what was right?
And then they're going to go through all of the journals. My, my, that
will take a bit of time, won't it? (Do you have any idea of how long
it takes to review ONE paper James? No, of course you don't.) Duh...
> When the funding, stops.
> Remember, my end goal is the same: remove your public financing.
>
You conveniently forget that colleges still need math teachers: that's
public funding. Mathematicians will always be employed James. Face it,
you lose. All you have are your crack pipe dreams.
M
|
