Re: Would you call this a paradox?

"Pubkeybreaker" <pubkeybreaker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:66b60723-c400-4012-893b-9d033b4a9d1d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jun 25, 7:36 am, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Doug Wedel wrote:
> > ineluctably to the conclusion that information is at its maximum in 
> > random
> > numbers.
>
> Let's suppose that the digits of pi are "random", i.e. that pi is
> normal.

They are not the same.

***********************
If the digits are random, the number is normal in all bases. Its the
reverse 
which is incorrect, but he didn't claim or use that fact.