In <j8do01pc5uqdjn00gvj2dokb96e39pmi1e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, on 02/10/2005
at 10:34 PM, Julnar <alhuriyeh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:25:05 GMT, letoured@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>In <lkgl01l16rgbkdv5svjgm5bspgd6tikct5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, on 02/09/2005
>> at 08:11 PM, Julnar <alhuriyeh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>
>>>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:06:51 GMT, letoured@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>My mistake. I mis-read who was saying what in your post. I agree
with
>>>>you that the bush administration and neo-cons are out to destroy the
>>>>middle class.
>>
>>>Why do people embarrass themselves by saying things like this? Where
>>>exactly does the done-toism come from?
>>
>>Really? So you think the people actually want what bush and the
neo-cons
>>are doing?
>I don't think it-- I know it. They voted this man in, twice. The people
>want him. If they aren't smart enough to know that they are not voting
>in their own interests, they deserve what they get. If this country
>sinks itself, it is 100% the fault of "the people". So cut the "nation
>of victims" crap. If Americans are victims, it is a self-inflicted wound
>are they are so stupid they deserve it. And anyway you have no damned
>idea what being a government victim really means.
A 51% plurality is not "the people."
BTW, I never said anything about being a government victim. You seem to
be responding to me while have a conversation with yourself or something.
>>-->Take a clue: You have a lot to learn about people and how the world
>>works. Come back sometime after you get out of college.
>Empty car, loudest, etc.
No son. I've just live longer then you have and try to think before
getting angry.
>JZ


|