Feynman was refutated time ago. This does not undermine his good work
in his field, but as a cosmologist is naive as a baby.
In article <1105116726.857447.24520@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
<ilya_shambat2004@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I've been reading Richard Feynman's Six Not-So-Easy Pieces.
>
>
> In his first chapter he makes the point that, because the laws of the
> universe will be perceived the same from wherever the person observes
> it, there is no way to find the center of the universe.
>
>
> That is a fallacy. That any given point can provide the vintage point
> of observation of the laws of the universe, means not that any point
> can be the center of the universe but rather that the laws of the
> universe are omnipresent within the universe - which, of course, they
> would be expected to be.
>
>
> In no way does that state that there is no such thing as the center
> of the universe, or the starting point for the laws of the universe,
> or a substance or a creator or a divine essence from which the universe
> comes.
>
>
> Ilya Shambat.
>
|
