Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Thinking hurts > Future Zombies:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 109 of 164
Post > Topic >>

Future Zombies: to be or not to be?

by "The Daily Excerpt" <bzbz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 9, 2005 at 02:02 PM

N. K. Brendleton: "According to reductive materialism, a particular
mental state will correspond to a specific physical state in brains. It
therefore allows the future possibility of cyborgs -- people with
extensive electronic replacement parts -- becoming zombies: beings who
may act as if they are conscious, but are really not. Functionalism, or
non-reductive materialism, rejects this possiblity because the
replacement parts will perform the same purpose as the original neural
****tions of the brain. Functionalism recogizes Multiple Realizability,
that the mechanistic material being utilized is irrelevent and any
physical system (like a computer) that runs the same program as the
brain will produce its various characteristics, including the notorious
qualia."

- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoted content does not necessarily reflect the views of the poster. It
is solely contributed as information or entertainment, and an
incipience for open discussion between members of stagnating forums.
Not for commercial use.

While limited extractions fall under exemption for fair use of
copyrighted works, any original, complete source may be and should be
regarded as protected by copyright law.

"The Daily Excerpt" is a regular feature of the abandoned usenet group
alt.thinking.hurts and may appear intermittently in other sparsely
populated regions (or even zones of major congestion), depending upon
topical applicability therein.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"The Daily Excerpt&q  2005-08-09 14:02:59 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"Sir Frederick"  2005-08-09 17:14:30 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"tooly" <rdh  2005-08-11 22:06:26 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"Sir Frederick"  2005-08-11 19:32:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 7:06:58 CDT 2008.