Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Thinking hurts > Re: Future Zomb...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 4 Topic 109 of 208
Post > Topic >>

Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?

by "Sir Frederick" <mmcneill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 11, 2005 at 07:32 PM

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:06:26 -0400, "tooly" <rdh11@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"Sir Frederick" <mmcneill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:hahif15f31t77k3mbotsj1plcdoej9cq11@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 9 Aug 2005 14:02:59 -0700, "The Daily Excerpt" <bzbz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>N. K. Brendleton: "According to reductive materialism, a particular
>>>mental state will correspond to a specific physical state in brains. It
>>>therefore allows the future possibility of cyborgs -- people with
>>>extensive electronic replacement parts -- becoming zombies: beings who
>>>may act as if they are conscious, but are really not. Functionalism, or
>>>non-reductive materialism, rejects this possiblity because the
>>>replacement parts will perform the same purpose as the original neural
>>>****tions of the brain. Functionalism recogizes Multiple Realizability,
>>>that the mechanistic material being utilized is irrelevent and any
>>>physical system (like a computer) that runs the same program as the
>>>brain will produce its various characteristics, including the notorious
>>>qualia."
>>>
>>>- - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> What do you mean 'future'?
>> We are all automatons with
>> self(personification and 'mind')
>> and qualia(sensor mapping)
>> stories dancing in our brains.
>> As I have said many times :
>> "We need our stories."
>> --

>
>Yea, but then there's that pesky 'fear and pain'.  If only our technology

>could rid us of that, I'd be the first to get in line for a brain staple
of 
>some sort.  Zombie-ism seems like a good alternative compared to having
to 
>deal with all the nuts running around in today's world. But...alas...pain

>and fear still exist...and thusly, I would resist, fearing the demise of 
>myself.  The present world, based in traditions [story's or whatever term

>you want to put on it], allow for a protective overcoat of socialability 
>that is like a rock to hide under.  It works allowing me a niche is all. 
>The new "brain theologians" are just a bigger fish wanting to crowd me
out 
>of that niche in the ocean.
>
>
>
That's your story. A story such as pain or fear is as functional as 
the voltage off of a thermocouple. Why do you argue? It works.
Would you rid that thermocouple of its voltage? No.
You may stay in your niche, in the ocean or anywhere. I ask for 
honesty, not dishonest folk tales. You may even continue 
practicing those folk tales, just not naively. We need to deal with the 
nuts. The rock has turned into a glass and a weapon.
We must learn to be sociable story zombies. Hubris and breeding 
no longer work.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"The Daily Excerpt&q  2005-08-09 14:02:59 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"Sir Frederick"  2005-08-09 17:14:30 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"tooly" <rdh  2005-08-11 22:06:26 
Re: Future Zombies: to be or not to be?
"Sir Frederick"  2005-08-11 19:32:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 23:39:07 CST 2008.