ibshambat2004@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> The people whose dispositions are most described by astrology charts
> are people who are most in tune to the archetypal energies.
I haven't seen all that many arched types(1), and as for them
energies there's gonna be an archetypal energy crisis real soon, and
then what will astrologers do? Huh?
> The people whose dispositions are most described by cultural analysis
> are people who are most shaped by the culture.
Golly, a real live tautology(2)!
> The people whose dispositions are most described by psychology are
> people who are most shaped by psychology.
Sometimes a peanus is just a peanus(3).
> The more of a disposition a person has, the more the system based on
> analysis of those dispositions describes that person.
That makes more sense than most of your psosts, but that's not saying
much(4).
(1) Or did you mean the font Archie comics were printed with?
(2) So, are people whose dispositions are best described by
taughtologies most shaped by academics?
(3) Except when it's a _______. Fill in the blank with a No. 2 pencil,
and please check your hat and pipe.
(4) Worse, you wrote it in English. I mean, if you're gonna philosophize
all deepy and everything, couldn't you at least do it in something
more appropriate, like ancient Celtic? And in obscure rhyme patterns.
And set it to Ska rhythms, arranged for bagpipe and didgeridoo. And
balalaika. Or possibly badger.
(n) OTOH all those peopums whose final disposition is not by embalming
and/or germs are disposed of by electric furnaces. Except those that run
afoul of hungry alligators/lions/tigers/bears OH MY!
Mark L. Fergerson
|
