Re: The Good ****p LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth

At the moment it does not matter which side one is on
as far as death is concerned.  The rich and privileged
perhaps could delay death but not avoid it.

The universe is governed by laws that would kill us
if we make the wrong moves.  Such laws are already
racking devastations around the world.  It would not
solve to just talk about climate change and its dangers.

Alternatives to saving the world may involve the complete
decommissioning of all weapons and armed forces.
Only taking what is needed.  Channelling most resources
into science proliferation, research and development
to colonise space.




"BradGuth" <bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1189359335.131468.266180@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 8, 6:08 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > It is the laws of physics both domestic and universal that
> > is causing all these climate changes that had begun
> > to kill.  And new mutants that are anti-Zionists would
> > perhaps would be brought to existence by these laws.
>
> Once again, either that one didn't come out right, or I'm simply not
> smart enough to understand whatever is meant by that short statement
> of yours.
>
> I would agree with utilizing intelligent design in order to improve
> upon human DNA, as obviously the random happenstance of evolution has
> rather badly failed us in the department of intelligence as will as in
> physical/biological aspects, with the percentage of defective humans
> going in the wrong direction unless you're among the wealthy and/or
> powerful
>
> Which side of salvaging Earth are you on?
> What alternatives do you have to offer?
> What is your expertise or best interest?
> - Brad Guth -
>