Re: The Good ****p LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth

What you say would be true if colonisation were to be done
on the surface.  But how about underground with sealed doors
to trap air and other resources?

"BradGuth" <bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1189624320.558543.145480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 11, 2:36 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I was also thinking about colonising Mars and Jupiter and Saturn.
> > Perhaps those planets may have greater fuel to burn.
>
> Now that's seriously "science fiction" worthy, isn't it.
>
> Obviously you're not even a good sf certified spook/mole, are you.
>
> You do realize that any halfwit worthy sf theory is 100% based upon
> those pesky regular laws of physics.  Perhaps our eventually
> accompli****ng something on a given moon of Saturn or Jupiter is doable
> if we only had rad-hard DNA to start off with, plus decades worth of
> spare life to toss away at managing to survive such horrific to/from
> commutes.
>
> At least our moon's L1 has been a doable as a mostly robotic quest for
> the past four decades, and of POOF City at VL2 affordably and even
> biologically doable for the past decade.
>
> Mars is nearly a lost cause unless you're looking for a good supply of
> dry ice and of a planet that's belching mostly CO2, and/or perhaps at
> best as having all of 1% of the accessible radioactive elements as
> Earth, but otherwise hosting a thousand fold more cosmic plus rather
> nasty loads of local secondary/recoil gamma and X-ray dosage for our
> frail DNA to deal with.  Mars is also of a nearly dead/inert
> planetology that's damn near older than hell, or didn't you know
> that?
> - Brad Guth -
>