Re: The Good ****p LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth

The problem is that all the talk about the core of the
moon not being im****tant is only based on extrapolations
and not on irrefutable facts.

Beside if I could not confirm or deny then I would not
make any point towards negation or affirmation.  Now
if that is naysayism by some standards then so be it
but I will not defy rational logic.


"BradGuth" <bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1189812160.966856.158100@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sep 13, 6:26 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > My faith based limited mindset???
> >
> > I was just answering as to why others may not be
> > participating in your thread. Since you asked for my
> > comments I found it obligating to provide an answer
> > that dawned upon me.  Besides it was just a possibility
> > and not absolute certainty that others may find your
> > suggestion unachievable, however as far as I am
> > concerned your suggestions cannot be dismissed
> > based on our incomplete knowledge intelligence and
> > capabilities.
>
> That's one of the best naysayism replies in town.  Where the heck were
> you when we needed another puppet warlord like Hitler?
>
> My ideas are somewhat dyslexic, a little weird from time to time but
> otherwise perfectly doable unless you're a certified naysayer that's
> also unable to think for yourself, much less think outside the box.
>
> BTW, what's wrong with our having a semi-hollow moon? (it most
> certainly doesn't have much if any iron core)
> - Brad Guth -
>