Re: The Good ****p LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth

If it is moderated then google would capture it as such.
However I do not believe that all newsgroups are moderated
and as such if no other reply appears then you have to accept
it as no one else is replying unless of course there is the rare
possibility of unique intervention and censor****p.  But I am not
that im****tant to be tracked down and censored.  So it must be
you who must be oozing with im****tance that everywhere you
go they track you down to censor or prevent communication.

Besides I download the posts from free press and therefore am
not likely censored or obstructed from other posts.


"BradGuth" <bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1190643653.872204.209960@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You should stick with the public 'free press' version of usenet, as it
> tells us the whole truth as to what's going down.  Otherwise you're in
> your own silly self-imposed braille world, without an actual clue as
> to what the public thinks or is ever allowed to see for themselves.
>
> As you say, if the given usenet servers (including GOOGLE) are likely
> into moderating out certain topics and/or allowing their insiders to
> topic/author stalk, bash or apply tactics of banishment (including the
> deployment of their spermware/****ware), but then lo and behold, it's
> not exactly a 'free press', is it.
>
> Since you're the one and only contributor, I'm thinking this topic has
> been selectively moderated, don't you?
> - Brad Guth -
>

> On Sep 23, 9:01 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Google as I understand archives newsgroups and
> > also allows moderated newsgroups.  Usenet begun
> > before google and uses NNTP protocol while
> > google archived newsgroups are internet web accessible
> > via the protocol HTTP.
> >
> > I have access to internet and am therefore able to access
> > google provided web pages, like for example
:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/topics?lnk=gschg
> >
> > However I prefer to access using NNTP because it is more easier
> > to see the latest posts without doing a visual search as I would
> > have to do if I use google.
> >
> > I do not use MAC. However I do use both microsoft OS and Linux OS.
> > Via both I could access internet using HTTP browser and usenet using
> > NNTP reader.
> >
> > Therefore there is no chance that I would miss any posting unless I
> > had to access the usenet only after a few days of break and the
> > service providers had via moderation had deleted certain posts.
>