Re: Vouchers lost in court, deserve no new chance

On May 5, 1:51=A0pm, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >buckeye wrote:
> >> Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> >> ...
> >> [**] Whether people should be forced to contribute money for
collectivi=
st
> >> social institutions or not is a separate issue altogether. As long as
> >> the system exists, for better or worse, everyone has to be treated
equa=
lly.
>
> >No, it is not a separate issue altogether. =A0It is actually THE source
o=
f
> >the issue -- does the purpose(s) of legitimate government include
social
> >program creation and management?
>
> Yes, at least in this country, since long before it was a country.
>
> Such has been the case since:
> <Text of the Massachusetts School Law of 1642
=2E..

surely you don't maintain schools are equal. Paying for the system is
also not equal. Teachers have tenure. Most people don't. Teachers have
lots of things that many other people don't get.

Why not have a law permitting vouchers that is equally available to
all?