Re: Vouchers lost in court, deserve no new chance

On May 6, 3:15=A0pm, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> That is, private schools truly are Lake Woebegon, where all children
ar=
e
> >> above average. Vouchers will do one of two things. Either it will
accel=
erate
> >> this affect, because if private schools are allowed to keep their
admis=
sions
> >> criteria, they'll =A0then be able to just take the top, say, 20%
instea=
d of
> >> the top 40%, or they'll lose many of the reasons parents want to send
t=
hem
> >> there.
>
> >Yep!!!!! =A0And as for "allowed to keep", =A0I don't see how they can
be
> >prohibited from having such criteria.
>
> Ever heard of the 14th amendment "equal protection under the law"?
>
> All they have to do is say that a school must meet certain conditions
> to be eligible for vouchers. =A0One of those conditions could be
> non-restrictive admissions.
>


Or the protection could be against restrictions. Equal use of vouchers
by parents  shall not be restricted. Or, lets do away with more
restrictions. No law restricting or reducing the education choices of
parents will be decreed. How about No laws favoring teachers or their
contracts with school districts shall be allowed and not interference
with local contract negotiations is permitted.