Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|buckeye wrote:
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|>
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|>
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|> My reply:
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|>
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|> This is what happens when the RRR ...
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|
>:|>> :|>> :|>> :|What is "RRR"?
>:|>> :|>> :|>
>:|>> :|>> :|> Most who read these particular newsgroups already know what
it stands for.
>:|>> :|>> :|> However, for those who don't
>:|>> :|>> :|> Radical Religious Right
>:|>> :|>> :|
>:|>> :|>> :|Ok, thanks.
>:|>> :|>> :|
>:|>> :|>> :|What is an example of the RRR?
>:|>> :|>
>:|>> :|> Are you totally helpless?
>:|>> :|> Look it up.
>:|>> :|
>:|>> :|Your post, your use of terminology, you substantiate it.
>:|>
>:|>
>:|> One doesn't generally have to substantiate that which is fairly well
>:|> recognized.
>:|>
>:|> Radical Religious Right is a term that is generally recognized and
>:|> understood by most in these various newsgroups.
>:|>
>:|> BTW, I substantiate it each and every time I post in with my
signature.
>:|>
>:|> I wonder if you are smart enough to find it in that signature.
>:|
>:|Ok, you concede.
My my what a childish retort. Most people give up that type e of childish
retorts when they leave the grade school playground.
Once again:
BTW, I substantiate it each and every time I post in with my signature.
I wonder if you are smart enough to find it in that signature.
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
|
