Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|mizlee wrote:
>:|> On May 9, 9:41?pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|>> Cary Kittrell wrote:
>:|>>> Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>:|>>>> Cary Kittrell wrote:
>:|>>>>> Peter:
>:|>>>>>> SkyEyes wrote:
>:|>>>>>>> On May 9, 1:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|>>>>>>>> buckeye wrote:
>:|>>>>>>>>> Thursday, May 08, 2008
>:|>>>>>>>>> The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
>:|>>>>>>>> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
>:|>>>>>>> John Hagee. ?Jerry Falwell (who fortunately is no longer with
us).
>:|>>>>>>> Pat Robertson. ?Rod Paisley. ?And a *host* of others.
>:|>>>>>>> Those are just the cult ringleaders. ?Want examples of their
political
>:|>>>>>>> lackeys?
>:|>>>>>> What is unreal regarding their understanding of homo***uality?
>:|>>>>> Well, Rushdoony, the intellectual founder of Christian
Reconstructionism
>:|>>>>> and the spiritual godfather, so to speak, of many of the leaders
>:|>>>>> of todays radical religious right, "understood" that all
homo***uals
>:|>>>>> should be put to death.
>:|>>>> We aren't talking about the RRR.
>:|>>>> Now, back to my question, still unanswered...
>:|>>> We weren't?
>:|>>> I thought that was exactly what you were asking about. ?
>:|>> Nope. ?Here is my question:
>:|>>
>:|>> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?- Hide quoted text -
>:|>>
>:|>> - Show quoted text -
>:|>
>:|> Methinks thou art a troll.
>:|
>:|Please substantiate.
All one has to do it read some of your posts and replies.
You have a M.O. you employ over and over again.
More and more are seeign it and recognizing it and some are pointing out
the obvious. Game playing, trolling, etc
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
|
