Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|That immutable trait, as you call it, is contrary to nature. This can
>:|be proven scientifically:
>:|
>:| Take a hetero***ual couple and place in an
>:| isolated yet life-sustaining environment.
>:|
>:| Do the same with a homo***ual couple.
>:|
>:| After a couple of generations of time,
>:| evaluate the results. Does nature sup****t
>:| human homo***uality?
>:|
I'm glad you decided to branch out into more topics other than the
Constitution topic. In branching out you are truly showing all just how
much a dunce you really are.
>:|I don't know if homo***uality is immutable or chosen, just as I don't
>:|know if a lot of behaviors are immutable or chosen. I DO know that
>:|controlling that which isn't beneficial to my or societal progression
is
>:|good for me and and society. That is not unreal.
The only thing I see as unreal here is you. You fit quite nicley into
the
mold of others like Strickland, Dana, Ken the christian idiot, and
hundreds
of others who have come along each like a clone of the other.
Good job.
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
|
