Re: Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?

malcolmkirkpatrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>On Jul 25, 8:02 pm, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> malcolmkirkpatrick
>
>> >I'll accept wikipedia for non-controversial tioics. The topic here is
>> >wikipedia's bias on global warming. Given the demonstratted partisan
>> >editing on this issue, for global warming, wikipedia is out of bounds.
>>
>> Coming from you, who plasters most of your postings with page-long
>> footers filled with partisanly-selective quotes from biased sources on
>> the controversial issue of vouchers, that comment is hilarious.
>>
>You mean, sources like American Economic Review, the Journal of School
>Psychology, and Comparative Education? These are peer reviewed.

So are the scientific journals where global warming has been almost
universally accepted.  

I suspect that there is a lot more unanimity among scientists that
global warming is occurring than there is among economists that
vouchers are a good thing.  And climatology is  science, whereas real
world economics is wannabe pseudoscience (as are all social
"sciences").

lojbab
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Lojban language www.lojban.org