Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > School Subjects Science > Re: INTELLIGENT...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 73 Topic 212 of 243
Post > Topic >>

Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy Confirms B-O-N-E -

by "Keith Schiffner" <schistan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 11, 2007 at 05:24 PM

"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:46d0cce0.817428349@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:18:23 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Keith
> Schiffner" <schistan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
> in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>
>>> Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
>>> grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
>>> f you.
>>> please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
>>> dumb as me.
>>
>>
>>There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation
etc. 
>>it's
>>strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
>
> Ummm...no.  I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
> understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
> understanding other things, like logic.

Well being as I don't speak English...but can read and write it your point
is 
moot. I speak American and await with bated breath for American to become
a 
written language with a grammar the properly reflect the spoken language.
Logic? In America, surely you jest it's the most illogical country this
side of 
France. The Russians are more logical than we are.
-- 
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy
 




 73 Posts in Topic:
INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy Confi
Ed Conrad <edconrad@[E  2007-06-10 12:27:36 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Nordmann <NordmannNick  2007-06-10 18:04:42 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Handy <handyoaka@[EMAI  2007-06-10 11:33:37 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Nordmann <NordmannNick  2007-06-11 06:47:33 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-11 07:25:51 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Gernot Hassenpflug <ge  2007-06-12 07:52:15 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkle  2007-06-11 11:30:03 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy
Henry <9/11/01@[EMAIL   2007-06-11 22:15:25 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy
BrianNZ <brian@[EMAIL   2007-06-12 14:22:21 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy
Henry <9/11/01@[EMAIL   2007-06-12 20:45:53 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
SPORTfighter <billamah  2007-06-11 14:15:26 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-11 16:18:23 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
simberg.interglobal@[EMAI  2007-06-11 22:31:18 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-11 16:21:16 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
simberg.interglobal@[EMAI  2007-06-11 23:28:39 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-11 18:18:11 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-11 18:58:11 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BrianNZ <brian@[EMAIL   2007-06-12 11:23:00 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
simberg.interglobal@[EMAI  2007-06-11 23:29:06 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BrianNZ <brian@[EMAIL   2007-06-12 11:43:42 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-11 17:24:42 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Cruithne3753 <cruithne  2007-06-12 16:58:26 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-12 11:40:36 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Alan Moore <alan.s.moo  2007-06-11 21:33:42 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-11 21:45:38 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Turby <turbosurfer@[EM  2007-06-12 00:27:21 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-12 11:32:23 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Alan Moore <alan.s.moo  2007-06-12 19:12:52 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-12 20:08:44 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-12 21:25:32 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-12 22:23:58 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-13 18:34:19 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Alan Moore <alan.s.moo  2007-06-13 20:40:29 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-13 22:22:05 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-12 14:04:28 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-12 14:08:38 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-12 14:19:20 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-12 14:21:14 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Shuurai <Shuurai11@[EM  2007-06-12 07:28:02 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Shuurai <Shuurai11@[EM  2007-06-12 07:35:00 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkle  2007-06-12 14:19:53 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"chassoto@[EMAIL PRO  2007-06-13 04:04:35 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-12 22:12:48 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-13 08:48:00 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-13 09:15:43 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Badger North <young_fo  2007-06-13 10:31:09 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Bob Myers" <  2007-06-13 11:37:38 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Badger North <young_fo  2007-06-13 11:14:10 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Fraser Johnston&quo  2007-06-14 11:38:43 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
SPORTfighter <billamah  2007-06-14 17:45:08 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
SPORTfighter <billamah  2007-06-14 17:47:00 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
simberg.interglobal@[EMAI  2007-06-15 00:55:19 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-14 19:00:44 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
simberg.interglobal@[EMAI  2007-06-15 01:21:57 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Mark Goldberg <msgoldb  2007-06-14 22:39:47 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Chas" <chas  2007-06-14 21:58:07 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-14 21:08:13 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-15 04:56:24 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
SPORTfighter <billamah  2007-06-15 20:10:42 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-17 21:37:22 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
robert casey <wa2ise@[  2007-06-17 22:15:44 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-18 13:19:41 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2007-06-18 07:34:03 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Jerry B. Altzman&qu  2007-06-18 10:47:30 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-18 09:20:16 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Chas" <chas  2007-06-18 10:02:38 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"Keith Schiffner&quo  2007-06-18 12:11:23 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"proehling" <  2007-06-18 11:12:28 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Sam the Bam <samthebam  2007-06-18 15:22:38 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
BradGuth <bradguth@[EM  2007-06-19 06:07:57 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2007-06-19 07:50:18 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Sam the Bam <samthebam  2007-06-19 15:44:33 
Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C
Timberwoof <timberwoof  2007-06-19 16:10:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 7:19:00 CDT 2008.