http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/ $ en-us Copyright 2003-2005, Talk About Network. All Rights Reserved. 2008-07-24T08:07:45+00:00 TAN rss@talkaboutnetwork.com Discussion hourly 1 1970-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://tan12.talkaboutnetwork.com/images/spacer.gif http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/ http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30815.html BOOK: ONE WITH THE UNIVERSE- THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE by Allen C. Goodrich SEE: ISBN 0-595-41598-9 ISBN 0-595-85946-1 COPYRIGHT 1984-2008 ALLEN C. GOODRICH OBSERVATIONS: ( COPYRIGHTED 1984-2008 A... GRAVITYMECHANIC2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-24T05:24:47+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30814.html Schr=F6dingers Universe One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo Wolffs brand new book: Schr=F6dingers Universe. Ive just now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will be ranked in importance right up there ... fitz ltzeusrdx@[EMAIL PROTECTED] gt Discussion 2008-07-23T10:09:06+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30813.html Dear Newsgroup: You have noticed that I have created Basti Newsgroups for better communications of public interests in specific areas. The roots of this idea started when I had difficulties to publish my pioneering works on NEW EXACT MATH (now over... Mehran Basti ltBasti05b@[EMAIL PROTECTED... Discussion 2008-07-18T03:20:48+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30811.html lwal...@lausd.net wrote: On Jul 14, 8:02=EF=BF=BDam, Bill Dubuque w...@nestle.csail.mit.edu wrot= e: plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote: Bill Dubuque w...@nestle.csail.mit.edu wrote: 1) =EF=BF=BDIs the hypothesized ring =EF=BF=BDAP =EF=BF=B... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-14T13:37:22+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30810.html On Jul 14, 8:02=A0am, Bill Dubuque w...@nestle.csail.mit.edu wrote: plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote: Bill Dubuque w...@nestle.csail.mit.edu wrote: 1) =A0Is the hypothesized ring =A0AP =A0a (totally) ordered ring, i.e. =A0 =A0 does AP have ... lwalke3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-14T12:44:56+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30809.html Bill Dubuque wrote: Bill Dubuque wrote: Archie, before I can comment you need to answer the following questions about your ring of AP-adics, henceforth called AP. 1) Is the hypothesized ring AP a (totally) ordered ring, i.e. does AP ha... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-14T12:43:39+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30807.html plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote: Bill Dubuque wrote: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com writes: Now Bill will not like my answer that I gave earlier. Nor did Dik Winter like any of my comments on Galois theory as it pertains to AP-adics. One of... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-14T03:31:06+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30806.html Bill Dubuque wrote: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com writes: Where Natural Numbers = AP-adics .. Archie, before I can comment you need to answer the following questions about your ring of AP-adics, henceforth called AP. Well, Bill, the reason... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-13T10:48:31+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30804.html Jesse F. Hughes wrote: Could also be that Jesse has seen your silly criticisms of perfectly good presentations of Euclids proof and has no desire to see you blather and rant along the same lines again. My expectations of a college professor in... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-10T16:38:20+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30803.html Jesse F. Hughes wrote: Jesse F. Hughes jesse@phiwumbda.org writes: We could also divide both sides of that equation by 9999...99997 and get another keen result. Well, coherence is overrated. Jesse Hughes, an adjunct professor of philosophy,... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-10T11:33:07+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30802.html Jesse F. Hughes wrote: I wonder why youre so interested in my repetition of a very well-known proof and how come you ignored my main point. Because your questions stem from your lack of understanding of a valid Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-10T11:09:21+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30801.html Jesse F. Hughes wrote: And I challenged you to post your version of a Euclid IP both direct and indirect. But apparently that is too much to ask of a mere philosophy professor. What an odd challenge! To the contrary. The only thing odd is ... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-10T09:41:00+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30799.html Archimedes Plutonium wrote: I believe we can prove the Riemann Hypothesis is false by a paralleling of primes of form where they are primes and an infinite set, but which they are so spread far apart that we only find the first such prime of th... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-06T11:05:09+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30798.html plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: The reason that multiply the lot add 1 works is that it is merely another form of primes such as 2k+1 or 2k-1. One form that does not work is 2k for 2 is the only even pri... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-06T10:43:48+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30797.html Archimedes Plutonium wrote: The reason that multiply the lot add 1 works is that it is merely another form of primes such as 2k+1 or 2k-1. One form that does not work is 2k for 2 is the only even prime number. Twin Primes are of the form k,k+2 ... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-06T01:15:55+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30796.html Bill Dubuque wrote: malcobe@gmail.com wrote: I keep on believing that the key idea [in Euclids proof that there are infinitely many primes] is the construction of the number the product of all primes plus one Actually the reason such proof... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-05T21:58:31+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30795.html Dear Newsgroup: The following are Basti Newsgroups (sites): Sci.bio: http://groups.google.com/group/MBScibio Sci.math: http://groups.google.com/group/MBScimath?hl=en Sci.physics: http://groups.google.com/group/MBSciphysics?hl=en The above si... Mehran Basti ltBasti05b@[EMAIL PROTECTED... Discussion 2008-07-05T21:51:46+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30793.html drmwec...@gmail.com wrote: Seldom has one human being (Archimedes Balonium) written so much and said so little of value. I offered the Atom Totality theory and the Fusion Barrier Principle and scores of other new ideas. By comparison Ecker has gi... plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-05T01:26:04+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30792.html Seldom has one human being (Archimedes Balonium) written so much and said so little of value. There is nothing wrong with the standard proof of the infinitude of prime. It is a clear proof by contradiction. One assumes one has them all and then cons... drmwecker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion 2008-07-05T00:26:32+00:00 http://www.talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/messages/30791.html Dear Newsgroup: The following are Basti Newsgroups: Sci.bio: http://groups.google.com/group/MBScibio Sci.math: http://groups.google.com/group/MBScimath?hl=en Sci.physics: http://groups.google.com/group/MBSciphysics?hl=en The above sites are c... Mehran Basti ltBasti05b@[EMAIL PROTECTED... Discussion 2008-07-04T23:50:09+00:00 Search talkabouteducation.com Science q http://talkabouteducation.com/group/sci.edu/search.html