D Herring wrote:
> VB claims to be more than that -- he claims to be a #1 tester of CAS
> software. Such a person is expected to not only find bugs, but submit
> quality bug re****ts.
VB is "expected" to submit quality bug re****ts??
By who ? Maybe by you. Not by me, for example.
A bug is a bug. I don't care who or how re****ts it.
Even little information is better than none.
I don't expect CAS to be perfect, but if VB
points out something does not work, I'm grateful,
even if I personally do not like VB style.
(Probably I would prefer a more impersonal style).
I may *prefer* if more details are given, but I can *expect*
this only if the bug re****ter is paid for his work, which it does
not seem to me to be the case here.
What I *expect* is that paid CAS people (which by
the way I admire almost inconditionally for their difficult
work) take into serious account every bug re****t,
even if not detailed, even is submitted by VB.
bye,
g.
|
