On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:05:32 +0100, nano bagonghi
<nano.bagonghiCUT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>D Herring wrote:
>
>> VB claims to be more than that -- he claims to be a #1 tester of CAS
>> software. Such a person is expected to not only find bugs, but submit
>> quality bug re****ts.
>
>VB is "expected" to submit quality bug re****ts??
>By who ? Maybe by you. Not by me, for example.
>
>A bug is a bug. I don't care who or how re****ts it.
>Even little information is better than none.
>
>I don't expect CAS to be perfect, but if VB
>points out something does not work, I'm grateful,
>even if I personally do not like VB style.
>(Probably I would prefer a more impersonal style).
>
>I may *prefer* if more details are given, but I can *expect*
>this only if the bug re****ter is paid for his work, which it does
>not seem to me to be the case here.
>
>What I *expect* is that paid CAS people (which by
>the way I admire almost inconditionally for their difficult
>work) take into serious account every bug re****t,
>even if not detailed, even is submitted by VB.
Well said!
quasi
|
