Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Science > Re: #545 Hardy'...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 1866 of 1945
Post > Topic >>

Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big mistake ; new textbook: Mathematical Physics (AP-adic Primer)

by Bill Dubuque <wgd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 3, 2008 at 11:30 PM

"Larry Hammick" <larryhammick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> Anyhow, here's a proof of IX.20 discovered by Filip Saidak in 2005 AD!
> Define inductively a sequence (x(n), y(n)) of ordered pairs by
>   x(1) = 2, > y(1) = 3
> and for n >= 2 :
>   x(n+1) = x(n)y(n)
>   y(n+1) = x(n)y(n) + 1
> By induction, x and y stay positive. Also x(n) and y(n) are relatively
prime 
> by definition. So y(n) has a prime factor which x(n) lacks, and that
factor, 
> along with all the factors of x(n), appears in x(n+1). So by induction
x(n) 
> has at least n distinct prime factors, for arbitrary n.

SIMPLER  NN + N has more prime factors than N

"Saidak's proof" is certainly not new.

--Bill Dubuque
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big
Tonico <Tonicopm@[EMAI  2008-07-03 09:56:18 
Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big m
"Larry Hammick"  2008-07-04 03:09:26 
Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big m
Bill Dubuque <wgd@[EMA  2008-07-03 23:30:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 19:29:15 CST 2008.