Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Science > Re: #545 Hardy'...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1876 of 1939
Post > Topic >>

Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big

by drmwecker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jul 5, 2008 at 12:26 AM

Seldom has one human being (Archimedes Balonium) written so much and
said so little of value.

There is nothing wrong with the standard proof of the infinitude of
prime. It is a clear proof by contradiction. One assumes one has them
all and then constructs a new number that may or may not actually be
prime, but even if composite, its divisors are not among the assumed
finite set of all primes.

Newbies should not be taken in by this nonsense.

Dr. Michael W. Ecker
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Pennsylvania State University
Wilkes-Barre Campus
Lehman, PA 18627
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: #545 Hardy's and Courant's and Polya's Euclid IP had a big
drmwecker@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-05 00:26:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 12:31:02 CST 2008.