drmwec...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Seldom has one human being (Archimedes Balonium) written so much and
> said so little of value.
>
I offered the Atom Totality theory and the Fusion Barrier Principle
and scores of other
new ideas. By comparison Ecker has given the world nothing as far as
new ideas of
any im****tance.
> There is nothing wrong with the standard proof of the infinitude of
> prime. It is a clear proof by contradiction. One assumes one has them
> all and then constructs a new number that may or may not actually be
> prime, but even if composite, its divisors are not among the assumed
> finite set of all primes.
How silly and stupid of you, for you then imply that the direct and
indirect
are identical proofs. Even a High School student can see that you are
wrong
on that score.
>
> Newbies should not be taken in by this nonsense.
>
> Dr. Michael W. Ecker
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> Pennsylvania State University
> Wilkes-Barre Campus
> Lehman, PA 18627
Hatred by envy is one of the worst hatreds in the world.
When someone is in education and then deny those that have achieved
something
of Corrective value and of newness, then they no longer belong in
education. Why they
deny others of the successes they achieve is probably due to their own
careers as
being lackluster and their bitterness then lashes out at people who
accomplish
something.
Ecker does not deserve to have a degree in mathematics when he cannot
even understand
a valid Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof. Of the list of 30 or more
math professors who
I cited in my book "Correcting the Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof,
some of them did
do a valid Euclid IP. Those that did not, are not in agreement with
Ecker. They recognize
the mistake and fault of their rendition. There was a team of authors
who I cited in my
book with a invalid Euclid IP and because of my insistence, they
corrected or at least
attempted to correct in a revised edition.
Even Wikipedia had a invalid Euclid IP and then changed it because of
my prodding.
In the above, it is apparent that Ecker is unable to do a valid Euclid
IP proof in direct and
indirect method.
In the old days before the Internet, these sour professors would
simply stew on campus
and not really be a menace to those in the sciences, but in our modern
day life, these sour
and bitter professors can magnify their bitterness in Internet
hatemongering.
When any teacher in education gets to the point where they cannot
recognize the achievement
or accomplishements of others in their respective science field, they
are more of a harm to the
science and the students and should be removed of education. If you
cannot congratulate someone
who achieved some work, then get you gone.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
