by Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulrich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 12, 2008 at 03:58 PM
On Mon, 12 May 2008 00:37:18 -0700 (PDT), "Philip P. Hart"
<auldphart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In a recent blog:
>
http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/05/selective_data_and_global_warm.php#more
> the jargon term "periodic trending(sic)" is used. Does anyone have a
> more mainstream or standard expression for this?
That's not a real piece of jargon. It is the author's attempt
to be descriptive, and he follows it with the detail of
what he means. He is not the one to blame -- he is
re****ting on someone else's bogus analysis.
In the mainstream - folks look for trends, and they look
for cycles. The blogger introduces "chaos" unnecessarily,
and does not do it well. As the first response says, "noise"
is the simpler term.
--
Rich Ulrich
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
