Dear readers of this group,
I think this article could only be called "complete nonsense"
Gernany has a similar party called "Die Linke" (the lefties) mainly
Communists
who dream of GDR.
Greetings
tuttipole
********************************************************************
On Sep 12, 8:20=A0pm, kenneth.se...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> The =C9PC (=C9galit=E9 Party of Canada) is coming to town - hopefully -
> by the the time the NEXT! elections roll round.
>
> THE G8! ****FT 2TRUE! Democracy
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
> The GOOD NEWS is that the =C9PC will make THE G8! ****FT
> 2TRUE! DEMOCRACY by giving Canadians the power (POWER
> 2THE PEOPLE, is *the* slogan of the =C9PC) to police the
> Government *financially* using the Internet.
>
> This will transform Canada from a Law+Order Police State to
> one based on PROSPERITY by making the Gov't's TOP! priority
> helping Canadians create their own small businesses so that
> they can be independently wealthy.
>
> Law+Order Police State
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Traditionally, the emphasis has always been putting more+more
> people in jail - year after year - in order to justify the building of
> more+more jails, the hiring of more+more cops+undercover
> cops resulting in an ever larger judiciary with more+more judges
> generating more+more Court cases that continually hike court
> costs+benefit lawyers at a time when crime is going down+down
> year after year. All this is ABSURD.
>
> It makes for INSANE, UNNECESSARY COSTS that result
> in an needlessly higher+higher levels of taxation for ALL!
> Canadians - year after year. This is SENSELESS ABUSE
> OF TAXPAYERS by a Police State.
>
> Who is victimized the most in this ENDLESS upward spiral
> of taxation? The poor+the working class.
>
> With the mere benefit of technology TAXES SHOULD BE
> GOING DOWN, NOT! UP.
>
> The =C9PC strongly believes it can get rid of poverty AND!
> continually LOWER! taxation levels by stimulating the
> economy through strong social initiatives while helping
> Canadians create their own small businesses.
>
> Small business already creates 80% of the jobs, yet
> Gov't REFUSES! to help them. HELPING SMALL
> BUSINESS will be the Gov't's TOP! priority with the
> =C9PC in power.
>
> IMPEDIMENT! 2Canadian Democracy: FREEMASONS
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> The UNDERLYING PROBLEM of the Canadian Gov't is
> the fact that its bureaucracy is entirely run by Freemasons
> including the judicial system just like that of every other
> Commonwealth country.
>
> For there to be a democracy, the judicial system must be
> INDEPENDENT from the rest of the Gov't.
>
> That is NOT the case in Canada - nor in any other country
> of the Commonwealth for that matter.
>
> In fact, Canada's FIRST! Prime Minister was not only a
> reputed drunkard, but also a Freemason who had the doors
> of the House of Commons barred TWICE! to Louis Riel
> when trying to take his seat in the House of Commons
> after being elected TWICE! to the House of Commons.
>
> By the way, it was Louis Riel, a Father of Confederation,
> who handed the North West Territories over to Canada
> based on the promises made by Britain to French-
> Canadians ("les Canayiens") in order to gain their full
> participation in the war of 1812 against the US, a war
> finally won by French-Canadians in the hand to hand
> combat in the streets of the City of Quebec. If Canada
> exists today as a separate entity to the United States
> its thanks to French-Canadians.
>
> The British had promised French-Canadians that their
> language + religion, Catholicism, would be respected
> by the British in return for their full participation in the
> war of 1812.
>
> The result of these promises were that there would be
> an English (British) Canada and a French Canada on
> equal footing with English Canada, that later formed
> the "dual reality" of the Canadian Constitution as
> witnessed by Canada's Coat of Arms: two (2) Canadas,
> each one with their respective national anthem.
>
> Quebec INDEPENDENCE: UNSTOPPABLE!
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Since the first days of McDonald, it became clear
> that the DUAL! CHARACTER of the Canadian
> Constitution was in danger.
>
> The hanging of Louis Riel confirmed for French-Canada
> that English-Canada was out to get French-Canadians.
>
> English-Canada did its very best to STAMP! OUT
> all vestiges of French-Canada outside of Quebec.
>
> Consequently, today, French-Canada technically
> does =A0NOT really exist outside of Quebec. Yet there
> are French-Canadian communities persist throughout
> Canada - *intentionally* ignored by English-Canada.
>
> 400 years of French history should have been celebrated
> THROUGHOUT! Canada, NOT! JUST in the province
> of Quebec.
>
> SHAME of Parliament for NOT! celebrating 400 years
> of French history in Canada. SHAME! on Mr. Harper.
> That's AN INSULT to French-Canada: just one many
> in a continual litany of insults by English-Canada.
>
> Canada is SUPPOSE! to be BILINGUAL.
>
> In fact, by virtue of our Constitution, THE RULE OF LAW,
> ALL! provinces including ALL! municipalities are supposed
> to be bilingual. Till now, only one province respects the
> Constitution of Canada: New Brunswick.
>
> Canadians don't respect their own Constitution.
>
> The =C9PC would CORRECT! this by ensuring that ALL!
> provinces+ALL! municipalities are bilingual by law and
> would encourage French immigration outside of Quebec
> ensuring that Canada is truly a bilingual nation.
>
> Gone are the days when French-Canadians OUTSIDE!
> of Quebec were told *repeatedly* to SPEAK WHITE or
> GO BACK to Quebec.
>
> It is said that McDonald wanted French-Canadians to
> understand that they were NOT! to cross the Ottawa
> River. They were to stay in Quebec. Our FIRST! Prime
> Minister was Canada's TRULY FIRST! SEPARATIST.
>
> Stephen Harper feels there should be an English Canada
> with a French-speaking Quebec: in order words, he feels
> the SAME! way as McDonald. This is NOT! acceptable
> to French-Canada and runs CONTRARY! to the Canadian
> Constitution.
>
> Let's NOT! French-Canadians have historically ALWAY!
> been badly treated by English-Canadians until the arrival
> of Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Canadian writer+
> historian, Gordon Sinclair pointed this often.
>
> Besides, English-Canadians made it a habit of making
> French-Canadians feeling INFERIOR with their FROGY
> JOKES up until the late 1960s and gave them dirt-poor
> jobs to the point that French-Canadians referred to them-
> selves as THE *WHITE* NIGGERS OF AMERICA.
>
> The end result today is this: Quebec INDEPENDENCE
> SENTIMENT GROWS! - by the year: it's UNSTOPPABLE.
>
> In fact, the WHOLE! WORLD has accepted Quebec
> as an INDEPENDENT NATION - for decades. At the
> Spanish book fair in Retiro Park in downtown Madrid
> in June 1975 Spanish publishers were talking to me
> saying that Quebec independence was INEVITABLE!
>
> Nowadays, it's almost a customary habit for a young
> NON-Canadian French-speaking person to say to a
> French-Canadian upon leaving: VIVE LE QU=C9BEC
> LIBRE ! Incidentally, this happened to me just the
> other day in the Eaton Centre.
>
> The European Community, I understand, is already
> making plans to integrate Quebec into the European
> Community once Quebec separates from Canada at
> which time I expect the United States of America will
> walk into Canada upon the pretext that it needs to
> boot out the Canadian Muslims as they're a potential
> threat to North American security.
>
> I suspect after 10 years as a US protectorate Canada
> will be fully integrated into the US state machinery.
>
> Which means what?
>
> Slave wages for working class Canadian working for
> US companies as always has been the case in Latin
> America.
>
> AMERICANIZATION! of Canada: TOP! US Priority
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> The TOP! priority of the US Gov't has ALWAY! BEEN
> the take over of Canada.
>
> Under Mr. Harper the RATE! of AMERICANIZATION
> is more than doubled - if not TRIPLED! Hudson's Bay,
> Zellers, Bell Canada, Tim Hortons, ... ALL! American
> owned.
>
> McMellan Bloedel, Canada's largest privately owned
> lumber business was bought by a US company only
> to be shut down three (3) years later like many people
> predicted the US would do as they have used this
> tactic before. Buy a Canadian company + shut it
> down three (3) years later.
>
> This hurts Canada + the US knows it.
>
> ALL! job losses recently in Canada have been due to
> *intentional*+ *unnecessary* closure of US businesses
> in Canada.
>
> When Hillary Clinton suggested that NAFTA benefited
> Canada more than the US, Mr. Harper should have
> pointed =A0out how the US companies are buying up
> Canadian companies at a phenomenal rate. However,
> when Canadian businesses try to penetrate the US
> market they find they are STONEWALLED + forced
> to backtrack.
>
> Mr. Harper should have pointed out that Canadian oil+
> gas goes South to the States without any tariffs thanks
> to Canada *willingness* to be a GOOD! US NEIGHBOUR.
>
> Did Mr. Harper defend Canada?
>
> NO!
>
> What did he do?
>
> NOTHING! Absolutely nothing.
>
> Apparently, he seems to believe the take over of Canada by
> the USA is a =A0GOOD! think.
>
> The =C9PC thinks NOT! + sees the USA as an economic threat.
>
> For that reason, the =C9PC intends to SLAP TARIFFS on US
> bound oil+gas until the USA decides to treat Canada *fairly*.
>
> Social Concerns NOT ADDRESSED by Parliament
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> The last Parliament like so many other Parliaments was
> apparently a DO-NOTHING! KANGAROO! Parliament when
> it came to dealing with social concerns. The next should
> NOT! be much different either and Canadians are expected
> to vote for nothing, why?
>
> The following concerns went NOT! addressed by Parliament.
>
> The Impoverishment of Canadians due to insanely high
> taxation and an employment insurance programs that
> ruins families.
>
> Poverty that DEBILITATE! Canadians resulting in a needless
> loss of national productivity. It so debilitating the poor doN'T
> have decent clothes to do volunteer work even if they wanted
> to. They can't afford to adequately feed themselves nor take
> the public trans****tation system forcing them to live a ghetto
> kind of existence. (By the way, the =C9PC would offer them
> FREE! public trans****tation as well as FREE! food+used
> furniture stores.)
>
> Too many people going to prison unnecessarily just because
> a judge arbitrarily decided that they brook the law. This is also
> a loss of national productivity. (The =C9PC would ensure that the
> justice system would deal only court cases that are in the public
> interest + that in all minor court cases there would have to be
> do***ented warnings + the Police would have to make sure
> that the person understands the law before charges can be
> layed + all court cases will require a jury. NO MORE SUM-
> MARY CONVICTIONS. Cops will need University degrees
> and will have to see policing as an extension of social services.)
>
> Inadequate social housing. In Toronto alone, 65,000+ families
> according to Habitat Canada require social housing + nothing
> is being done about this.
>
> 20% of children are STILL! living in poverty after Prime Minister
> Mulroney promised in the early 1980s that the Gov't would
> end children poverty in Canada over a 20-year period. And
> what has the Gov't done? NOTHING! NOTHING!
>
> The problem is this: a Canadian family has to earn at least
> $70,000 in order to afford to pay for a mortgage. For those
> earning starvation wages owning a home is an impossibility.
> (With the =C9PC in power minimum wage be high enough -
> subsidized the Gov't where necessary - so that Canadians
> can afford to buy a home.)
>
> Exorbitant university+college tuition fees. They're becoming
> more+more a DISINCENTIVE! for getting a good education
> at a time when the World knows that a country's competitive
> advantage is directly dependent upon the education level of
> its population. (With the =C9PC in power there would be NO!
> university+college tuition fees.)
>
> Parliamentarian need to stop twiddling their thumbs + picking
> their nose while sitting on duffs and address these pressing
> issues if not attended could potentially lead to DOMESTIC
> TERRORISM down the road.
>
> Election Prediction
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Regardless of what party win the elections one (1) thing
> seems to be certain: Canadians are *stuck* with a KANGAROO
> Parliament that *refuses* to address their pressing concerns.
>
> Hence, VOTING is POINTLESS. The =C9PC is urging Canadians
> to take the day OFF! and be good to themselves instead.
>
> About 16+ Political Parties
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> It is agreed that Mr. Mulroney singlehandedly destroyed the PC
> Party and with Mr. Stephen Harper the PC Party might just be
> on life-sup****t.
>
> After Mr. Harper, what will be left of the Tory Party? This once
> robust party is but a shell.
>
> It is also agreed that Mr. Chr=E9tien + Mr. Paul Martin were equally
> responsible for the Liberal Party taking a nose dive thanks to the
> Quebec Sponsor****p Scandal. Now, Mr. St=E9phane Dion leads this
> ill-fated party.
>
> And Mr. Dion, well his strategy seems to be to bore if not befuddle
> Canadians (so much for clarity - NOT at Election time, eh.) all the
> while appearing sincere in talking about his Green ****ft. A straight
> comic he is.
>
> Apparently, when he was the federal Minister of Environment he
> more or less told the Quebec Minister of Environment to "cool"
> it. Today, he's a born again environmentalist. Talk about a on
> the road to Damascus conversion experience. In any case, he
> see the light.
>
> One party that swears by environment is the Green Party. It's
> their ONE+ONLY issue.
>
> Then, there's the NDP (New Democratic Party) that has had
> limited success in becoming the governing party in a number
> of provinces.
>
> The end result is many in Canadian Labour Movement no
> longer have any use for them as they did little if anything
> to help the working class.
>
> If Bob Rae, former leader of the Ontario NDP Party, can go
> over to the Liberal Party, it's pretty clear that the differences
> between the Liberal Party + NDP are negligible.
>
> Jack Layton wants to lead Canadians into the Promised
> Land, but who wants to follow this Pied Piper? NOT those
> in the Labour Movement it seems.
>
> Then, there are two (2) very SUSPICIOUS political parties
> - in my view: federally, Action Canada, and provincially,
> Qu=E9bec Solidaire. Both creatures invented, I suspect, by
> the Canadian intelligence community: their response to
> Quebec separatism. Another blatant waste of taxpayers
> dollars just like 6000+ undercover cops and Gov't operatives
> in Gov't sponsored organizations and in the anti-poverty
> movement.
>
> There are other political parties that are inconspicuous
> not worth mentioning.
>
> Then, there's the =C9PC (=C9galit=E9 Party of Canada).
>
> The =C9PC, Canada's Hail Mary Political Party
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> This political party believes that it will become the
> governing party thanks to Canadians thirst for CLEAN!
> Gov't and a STRONG ECONOMY.
>
> The =C9PC (=C9galit=E9 Party of Canada) is a fun political party
> oriented towards the future.
>
> For 100% CLEAN! Gov't financially policed by Canadians
> via the Internet, SUP****T the =C9PC (=C9galt=E9 Party of Canada).
>
> It's the ONLY! political party committed BOTH! to
> REDISTRIBUTING THE WEALTH by DECRIMINALIZING
> the Gov't in order to eliminate poverty and to helping
> Canadians build their own small businesses so that
> can be independently wealthy.
>
> Kenneth Selin (say'leen)
> B.A.(Psychology), B.A.(Spanish), B.Admin.,
> B.Comm.(Honours), B.A.(Italian) "magna *** laude"
> ~~~
> President/Party Leader of the =C9galit=E9 Party of
Canadahttp://www.eh-ok=
..ca
> ~~~
> Let's DEcriminalize Government in order to end proverty.
> D=C9criminalisons le Gouvernement afin d'enrayer la pauvret=E9.
> ~~~
> "talking about a revolution" (Tracy
Chapman)http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=
=3DSKYWOwWAguk&mode=3Drelated&search=3D
|
