by Hugh Watkins <hugh.watkins@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Dec 9, 2007 at 01:44 AM
Gerry wrote:
> I have read many of the opinions expressed here about this product.
>
> I am now getting a lot of offers for FTM 2008 to which they have 'made
> improvements'.
> Anyone get the new improved model yet.
yes
> How do you rate it?
wait and see
FTM 16 is easier to use for me
you can enter data fom the keyboard without using the mouse
just like a spreadsheet
a better GUI
I have put a blog together with screen shots
http://mac-on-intel.blogspot.com/2007/12/family-tree-maker-comparing-16-and-2008.html
FTM 2008
has more features
like geocoding to a modern map
unfortunately I use original place names and adminstrative details - -
historical counties from the census for example
great for newbies with small trees
two "NO-NO"s
1) never merge more than two individuals or im****t and add a new
database with more than one common individual
2)
never imbed images
in FTM16 or FTM 2008 main file
store them in a safe place
back them up out of house
If you need images for a book or tree - then to make an illustrated
book or tree first ex****t a file and work with copies of the file and
the images
The major advantage of working in FTM 16 is easier data entry
filling up a Family View can be done as easily as using a spread sheet
all from the kyboard
Hugh W
--
For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and
district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/http://snaps4.blogspot.com/
photographs and walks
GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/
MAIN BLOG