JD <jd4x4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Ian Goddard <goddai01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>JD <jd4x4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>Having written the diatribe about XML, now I'm asking if anyone can
>>>point me to either software apps, or utilities that use XML-compliant
>>>file/schema which help deal with genealogy data?
>>>
>>>I'm not looking for format translators, but rather something that
>>>uses an XML format file and is applicable to genealogy/family
>>>history.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>
>>I understand that Gramps at
>>http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
used XML
>>as its database format in earlier versions. It now uses RDBMS
>>internally but will still im****t and ex****t XML.
>>
>>This is more or less the pair of choices I'd have made for myself. I
>>might not, however, have chosen Berkeley DB as the database as not
>>only is it not SQL-based, it isn't, as I understand it, suitable for
>>storing its data on networked drives.
>>
>>It's the package I use but it's still far from what I'd like to have
>>available.
>>
>
>
> Ah, yes! Thanks Ian. I heard someone else mention it but never checked
it
> out!
>
> Check this link- if I understood your gggfather situation, I think it
> would handle it, but it made me dizzy when I looked at it! (your
> situation as well, but I really meant this software!).
>
> http://www.genopro.com/
you do in fact have two unconnected trees
because you have no evidence of which is correct
and without deeds or wills you may never know
you may of course look for the descendacy of the other one
your problem is of method
pedigree has to end somewhere
GIGO
which is why family history is more fun
Hugh W
--
For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and
district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/
http://snaps4.blogspot.com/
photographs and walks
GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/
MAIN BLOG
|
