Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Computing > Re: Married wom...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 6 Topic 1909 of 2083
Post > Topic >>

Re: Married women's surnames?

by Terry Pinnell <terrypin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 25, 2008 at 02:21 PM

myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (cecilia) wrote:

>Terry Pinnell wrote
>>I've got myself a bit confused about a very basic point. I'm making
>>some tree charts for a long-widowed aunt who uses her married name,
>>say Mary Smith. But in FTM she is of course identified by her maiden
>>name, say Mary Brown. How do you resolve the problem that the tree
>>charts will be headed 'Mary Smith', a name she and her relatives
>>haven't used for decades?
>
>
>You could head the chart "Mary Brown, nee Smith"  

Thanks all. I thought that the title field in these charts was linked
directly to the FTM database. But, although it does that to
automatically generate the initial default, I've since learned (from
Paul Blair in soc.genealogy.computing) that you can subsequently
customise it via the menu, using Contents|Title & Footnote... So I've
simply headed it 'Mary Smith : Descendants'.

-- 
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-24 19:51:49 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Jenny M Benson <nemone  2008-01-24 20:21:37 
Re: Married women's surnames?
myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-24 23:39:28 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-25 14:21:09 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-25 14:26:31 
Re: Married women's surnames?
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-25 11:05:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 16:24:03 PST 2009.