Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Computing > Re: Married wom...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 6 Topic 1909 of 2083
Post > Topic >>

Re: Married women's surnames?

by Terry Pinnell <terrypin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 25, 2008 at 02:26 PM

Terry Pinnell <terrypin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (cecilia) wrote:
>
>>Terry Pinnell wrote
>>>I've got myself a bit confused about a very basic point. I'm making
>>>some tree charts for a long-widowed aunt who uses her married name,
>>>say Mary Smith. But in FTM she is of course identified by her maiden
>>>name, say Mary Brown. How do you resolve the problem that the tree
>>>charts will be headed 'Mary Smith', a name she and her relatives
>>>haven't used for decades?

If anyone ends up here with a similar query, the above will only add
to confusion! It should of course have been:
"How do you resolve the problem that the tree charts will be headed
'Mary Brown', a name she and her relatives haven't used for decades?"

-- 
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-24 19:51:49 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Jenny M Benson <nemone  2008-01-24 20:21:37 
Re: Married women's surnames?
myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-24 23:39:28 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-25 14:21:09 
Re: Married women's surnames?
Terry Pinnell <terrypi  2008-01-25 14:26:31 
Re: Married women's surnames?
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-25 11:05:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 0:58:59 PST 2009.