Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, Computing > Re: Genealogica...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 65 of 85 Topic 1900 of 2074
Post > Topic >>

Re: Genealogical evidence and data model

by Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 1, 2008 at 10:24 AM

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:07:37 PST, mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Everett M. Greene) declaimed the following in soc.genealogy.computing:

> 
> How do you find the pedigree of an individual in an event-linked
> database?  It would seem that you'd have links to all over the
> place to a lot of events that many people would consider to be
> trivia and no "root" from which to start tracing the lineage
> of any individual.
>
	Those "links" to all those other people are typically assigned roles
(titles), so one scheme would be that a birth even has the primary
person (the one whose birth is being recorded in the event) and may have
two roles (father, mother) which link to the specified parents. In this
scheme, a bloodline is created by following those particular roles.

	The alternative, used by TMG, is to create relation****p events --
one event for father relation****p, one for mother relation****p. In TMG,
every event ("tag") has room for two "principles", all the "other
people" are added into a witness list in the event.

	Instead of the lineage-linked "family" record that has an individual
and two pointers (father, mother).

> Perhaps I don't grasp the concept of event-linked data, but
> it makes it seem that event-linked would be like a stew --
> everything's in there but just try to find a particular
> item.

	Works well -- and fits a relational database structure much easier.
It even allows for insertion of candidate relation****ps... while only
one each of "father/mother" is marked as "primary" (meaning it is used
for producing re****ts that need to trace generations), one can still add
other relation****ps... So one can have, say, father-birth relation****p
as primary if one wants to trace actual bloodline, but also add a
father-adoption relation****p... By making the latter "primary" the same
re****t would now trace "family" rather than blood...
-- 
	Wulfraed	Dennis Lee Bieber		KD6MOG
	wlfraed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bestiaria Sup****t Staff:		web-asst@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
		HTTP://www.bestiaria.com/
 




 85 Posts in Topic:
Genealogical evidence and data model
bobg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-01-14 20:42:20 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-14 21:16:23 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-14 23:38:19 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
bobg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-01-15 13:29:00 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-17 04:39:17 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-15 12:08:13 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
bobg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-01-15 18:07:49 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-01-15 10:27:26 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-01-15 10:15:48 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Lars Erik Bryld <larse  2008-01-15 19:39:34 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-17 04:50:24 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-17 15:51:06 
Non sequitur: (Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-01-17 23:49:06 
Re: Non sequitur: (Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
bobg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-01-18 14:35:32 
Re: Non sequitur: (Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-18 19:43:16 
Re: Non sequitur: (Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-19 10:56:02 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
"Kerry Raymond"  2008-01-19 09:35:56 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
JD <jd4x4@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-19 09:38:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Robert G. Eldridge <ro  2008-01-20 11:31:15 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-20 13:34:43 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@[  2008-01-20 14:35:26 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-20 17:36:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-01-20 17:36:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-20 23:02:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-20 08:40:28 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-20 11:16:19 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Charlie Hoffpauir <inv  2008-01-20 10:24:01 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-20 17:45:56 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-01-20 19:04:53 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-21 11:14:15 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-22 00:49:47 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@[  2008-02-03 16:32:07 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-02-03 20:01:28 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-04 05:29:38 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-04 09:13:38 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-04 11:01:01 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-20 22:21:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-20 22:55:52 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-01-20 23:26:02 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-03 11:23:23 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-04 05:22:26 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-04 07:59:58 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-02-04 11:35:44 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-04 23:13:33 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
"Tony Proctor"   2008-01-30 17:39:37 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-01-30 15:16:17 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
"Tony Proctor"   2008-01-31 09:56:57 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-03 07:51:46 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-03 16:11:36 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Denis Beauregard <deni  2008-01-15 13:18:28 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
bobg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-01-15 18:34:21 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-17 05:58:41 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-01-31 07:11:12 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-01-31 16:03:38 
The need for event-based software
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-02-01 04:15:45 
Re: The need for event-based software
Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-01 15:13:29 
Re: The need for event-based software
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-02-03 22:04:41 
Re: The need for event-based software
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-02-04 04:14:57 
Re: The need for event-based software
shane@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-07 21:10:00 
Re: The need for event-based software
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-02-09 10:20:13 
The need for record-based software
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-02-08 14:21:52 
Re: The need for record-based software
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-08 11:21:35 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-02-01 10:30:19 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-01 09:07:37 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-01 10:24:42 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-01-31 20:41:20 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-01 20:14:46 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-02-08 12:44:05 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-01 20:57:39 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-02 03:06:26 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-02 16:06:50 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-02-02 11:49:26 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-01 16:24:12 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-01 22:05:01 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-02 13:58:29 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-02 18:13:34 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2008-02-08 16:10:32 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-02 17:53:09 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-02 18:23:12 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2008-02-02 19:24:28 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Haines Brown <brownh@[  2008-02-02 21:32:49 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlf  2008-02-02 22:00:02 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-02-03 07:16:34 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
Denis Beauregard <deni  2008-02-03 01:50:27 
Re: Genealogical evidence and data model
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-02-03 12:01:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 22:21:25 CST 2008.