On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:04:41 +0100, Hugh Watkins <hugh.watkins@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Steve Hayes wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:11:12 -0500, Haines Brown
>> <brownh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> A very interesting thread. I hope no one minds if a non-genealogist
>>> jumps in with questions.
>>>
>>> My sense of the distinction of a relation-based and an event based
>>> structure is clear to me only in the abstract, but not in concrete
>>> terms. Would someone be willing to offer a simple example of each to
>>> help make the distinction clearer?
>>
>> I've given this a different subject line because it is a different
thread.
>>
>> I've long felt a need for event-based software that would take a
different
>> approach to ordinary lineage-linked genealogy software and take a
different
>> approach. It woudl be useful for family history research rather than
pure
>> genealogy, and for other kind of historical research as well.
>>
>> I've even developed a sort of data model, which I've semi-implemented
in
>> creating a database to illustrate it.
>>
>> Let me try to give a concrete illustration of the difference.
>>
>> Say you are writing a biography of a person, and you want software to
help
>> you in your research.
>>
>> In a hypothetical event-based program you would enter people who
impinged on
>> the life of your subject as you do with genealogy software. Some would
be
>> genealogically related and some not.
>>
>> The birth event, for example, would have your subject's birth, with
parents
>> (obviously), but others like midwives, obstetricians and so on also
linked.
>>
>> Twenty-one years later there might be a 21st birthday party, and you
would
>> have that as an event, and a description of the event, and then link
people in
>> your database to the event -- friends and relatives who attended.
>>
>> After entering a lot of events in the subject's life, you could create
a
>> chronology of the events, and of the people associated with your
subject at
>> each stage - parents, friends, teachers, classmates, bosses, and so on.
If you
>> were doing a biography, you could include in notes on various people
their
>> recollections of the subject, and the subjects recollections of them.
>>
>> In this hypothetical program, it should be possibly to im****t family
relations
>> (via GEDCOM) from lineage-linked software, but also from address books
etc.
>>
>> Such software could be used for other purposes.
>>
>> Onme of the things I do research on is African Independent churches. I
have
>> three different databases or datasets -- churches, leaders and events.
It
>> would be useful to be able to link them in a relational database, but I
don't
>> have the skill to design such a database. Also, as software goes
obsolete one
>> would spend more time on redesigning it than entering and manipulating
data,
>> so you would never get any reseach done because you would always be
tinkering
>> with the tools. I once tried to do it with Paradox, but now everyone
uses
>> Access, and it would have to be rewritten from scratch, and I've never
found
>> books on Access that can tell me what I used to know about Paradox.
>>
>> So I lumber along using an old DOS program called Inmagic, which serves
my
>> purpose.
>>
>> I'm playing with a Windows program called askSam (I also continue to
use the
>> DOS version) which I use for entering raw genealogical data from
different
>> sources and material for other research projects. These are useful
research
>> tools, but an event-based relational program would be a useful
addition.
>>
>
>Custodian 3 is used by one-namers
I looked at Custodian 2, and it seemed useful for managing sources, less
useful for managing and linking information.
There is also Clooz, but that that is also not quite what I'm thinking of.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop
uk
|
