I don't know Macs, I have never known Macs, and unless someone starts
giving
them away, I will never know Macs. I can only go on what my rellies (who
have only ever had Macs) told me. Try READING my first message again and
you
will see that I only re****ted what my rellies told me. When they tried to
trans****t the data across, the new confuser advised that the info. was in
a
format prior to the new confuser and wouldn't accept it.
--
Bob JONES
Where does your lap go when you stand up?
"Dave Hinz" <DaveHinz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:618qe3F1u6j48U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:08:32 GMT, Bob Jones <rjo25512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, Macs aren't as "robust" as you think. I have some senior
>> rellies that are Mac tragics and have found that not all Macs are
>> backward
>> compatible. They have recently bought a new Mac which has "X" OS
>> installed
>
> Every Mac ****pped in the last 7 years or so will be running some version
> of OSX.
>
>> and which will not accept any data from their old Mac which is using a
>> version "10.?.?".
>
> Then they're doing it wrong. OS-X is version 10. And for the first 5
> years of OS-X, it ****pped with "classic" mode which would allow users to
> access apps up to 10 or 15 years old.
>
> Please don't spread misinformation about a computer platform you clearly
> don't understand. It doesn't help anything.
>
|
