"Dave Hinz" <DaveHinz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:619pjbF1u47cuU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:49:11 GMT, Bob Jones <rjo25512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> I don't know Macs, I have never known Macs, and unless someone starts
>> giving
>> them away, I will never know Macs.
>
> Apparently.
>
>> I can only go on what my rellies (who
>> have only ever had Macs) told me. Try READING my first message again
and
>> you
>> will see that I only re****ted what my rellies told me.
>
> And then, you presented it as if you had any sort of authority in the
> matter.
>
>> When they tried to
>> trans****t the data across, the new confuser advised that the info. was
in
>> a
>> format prior to the new confuser and wouldn't accept it.
>
> If you have specifics, perhaps any of the many Mac folks here would be
> able to help. As it is, you made a sweeping generalization which is
> demonstrably false, combined with a helping of attitude, and obvious
> confusion (X vs. 10). Rarely an effective way to actually help people
> with a question.
>
> It's not a big deal that you don't understand them, and that your
> relatives are having problems. But, as I said, please don't then spread
> your ignorance while pretending you know what you're talking about.
Do I need to repeat myself? Apparently so!
"I don't know Macs, I have never known Macs, and unless someone starts
giving
them away, I will never know Macs. "
Please explain how you managed to translate the foregoing direct quote
into
"pretending you know what you're talking about".
--
Bob JONES
How come your family coat-of-arms ties at the back?
|
