On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:47:32 GMT, Bob Jones <rjo25512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> "Dave Hinz" <DaveHinz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:619pjbF1u47cuU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> It's not a big deal that you don't understand them, and that your
>> relatives are having problems. But, as I said, please don't then
spread
>> your ignorance while pretending you know what you're talking about.
> Do I need to repeat myself? Apparently so!
> "I don't know Macs, I have never known Macs, and unless someone starts
> giving
> them away, I will never know Macs. "
Then, why did you pretend to tell us how Macs weren't "robust" because
of your vague, poorly understood understanding of your relatives poorly
understood problems?
> Please explain how you managed to translate the foregoing direct quote
into
> "pretending you know what you're talking about".
Why did you answer and pretend you had something to contribute, when
clearly you don't? Or, was your intent to show your ignorance and
inaccuracy? If that was your intent, well, well done.
It's interesting, really. Most "windows people" who dislike mac, do so
out of ignorance. And most "mac people" who dislike Windows, do so out
of experience.
So. Did you want to talk about the problems your relatives had, or do
you just want to pretend that they're somehow a valid reason to call an
entire computing "not rubust"? Or maybe just drop it.
|
