Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, Computing > Re: February 30...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 23 Topic 1942 of 2073
Post > Topic >>

Re: February 30th

by Mike Williams <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 9, 2008 at 08:47 AM

Wasn't it David Harper who wrote:
>
>According to histories of the calendar, February has never had more 
>than 29 days, even in the time of the Roman Republic before Julius 
>Caesar's overhaul.
>
>Thus any appearance of 30 February in historical records is certainly 
>the result of clerical ineptitude or inebriation :-)

In Sweden and (what is now) Finland, they started to use a weird system 
for slowly changing from Julian to Gregorian calendar systems. A few 
years later they changed their minds and reverted back to the Julian 
Calendar by having two leap days in 1712, the 29th and 30th of February.

http://www.naturalistsalmanac.com/0230.html

In the Soviet Revolutionary Calendar, all months had 30 working days, 
and the year was padded out with 5 or 6 "monthless" holidays. The Soviet 
Revolutionary Calendar doesn't appear to have actually been used.

In the French Republican Calendar, all months had 30 days and the year 
was padded out with 5 or 6 "monthless" holidays, called sansculottides . 
However, the French Republican months don't correspond with the months 
of the Gregorian calendar, since its year starts at the autumnal equinox 
(September 23 plus or minus 1 day).

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
February 30th
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2008-03-08 17:39:49 
Re: February 30th
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-03-08 13:51:19 
Re: February 30th
Mardon <mgb72mgb@[EMAI  2008-03-09 00:36:49 
Re: February 30th
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-03-09 01:20:15 
Re: February 30th
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-03-08 14:50:23 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-09 08:07:50 
Re: February 30th
Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-09 17:15:42 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-09 18:12:40 
Re: February 30th
Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-09 20:03:13 
Re: February 30th
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-10 10:46:07 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-10 21:49:26 
Re: February 30th
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-11 12:07:12 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-12 08:49:55 
Re: February 30th
bblais <bblais@[EMAIL   2008-03-12 03:11:03 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-12 12:29:09 
Re: February 30th
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-12 11:37:16 
Re: February 30th
Robert G. Eldridge <ro  2008-03-13 15:10:17 
Re: February 30th
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-03-09 00:44:17 
Re: February 30th
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-03-09 08:47:22 
Re: February 30th
David Harper <devnull@  2008-03-09 09:17:27 
Re: February 30th
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2008-03-10 17:41:04 
Re: February 30th
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-03-10 14:35:33 
Re: February 30th
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2008-03-10 21:35:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:00:23 CST 2008.