Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Computing > Re: Here's the ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 2071 of 2083
Post > Topic >>

Re: Here's the plan

by <bill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 1, 2008 at 12:18 AM

All

I believe like everone else says ... that information is for sharing BUT 
what I am against is using freely given information and then charging for
it 
! to some unsuspecting individuals....

Any info I have on my site which I don't want "nicked" is encrypted using 
Taglock pro software at http://www.tagslock.com/

It doesn't stop anyone "reading" it but doesn't allow stealing it !

regards

Bill

PS - No interests or connections to this software at ALL

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kurt" <kurt.fredriksson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
To: <gencmp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Here's the plan


>
> "J. Hugh Sullivan" <Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:4932a756.3741765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:04:27 +0000, Ian Goddard
>> <goddai01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >Bhoggatt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> >> On Nov 29, 6:22 am, Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>> In message of 29 Nov, Bhogg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Mr. Alciere:
>> >>>> Please explain your method of taking copyrighted information
> without
>> >>>> permission from other websites.
>> >>> I am reasonably sure that in most countries data is not
> copywrightable,
>> >>> only the method of presentation is.
>> >>>
>> >>> In any case the must more serious problem with this sort of data
> is its
>> >>> veracity: what information is given about the reproducible
> sources of
>> >>> the data?  The average website has no such information, so is
> worthless.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Tim Powys-Lybbe
> t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>              For a miscellany of bygones:http://powys.org/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I beg to differ.  The presentation on the web is the coyrightable
>> >> component.  Scraping web sites and not producing it from your own
>> >> sources is a violation and often times the reason that many
>> >> researchers stop providing information.
>> >
>> >For one thing the OP wasn't about scraping websites, it was about
>> >uploading of original transcripts.
>> >
>> >And for another, anyone who wants to publish but not have what he
>> >published used by others needs to ask himself why he published in
> the
>> >first place.  For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
> it!!!!
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Ian
>>
>> People need to be educated about sourcing when they use shared data.
> A
>> source is where a person got the data, not where someone else got
> the
>> data (except as a secondary source).
>>
>> Too many times we find that data we researched over a long period of
>> time is scavenged by others who show themselves as the source.
>>
>> Hugh
>
> So what?
>
> I have published my research together with sources. Iīm doing it for
> my own pleasure and donīt mind if other researchers are copying the
> information. Please observe that I said "the information" not MY
> information.
> As Ian said: "For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
> it!!!!"
>
> Kurt F
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to 
> GENCMP-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes 
> in the subject and the body of the message
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Here's the plan
<bill@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-12-01 00:18:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 2:38:43 PST 2009.