Hmmm
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:18:36 +0900, <bill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> All
>
> I believe like everone else says ... that information is for sharing BUT
> what I am against is using freely given information and then charging
> for it
> ! to some unsuspecting individuals....
>
> Any info I have on my site which I don't want "nicked" is encrypted
using
> Taglock pro software at http://www.tagslock.com/
>
> It doesn't stop anyone "reading" it but doesn't allow stealing it !
>
> regards
>
> Bill
>
> PS - No interests or connections to this software at ALL
How about a test of this software. If you would supply your URL I would
like to test it as I think anything that is visible in a browser can be
"nicked".
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kurt" <kurt.fredriksson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
> To: <gencmp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Here's the plan
>
>
>>
>> "J. Hugh Sullivan" <Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:4932a756.3741765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:04:27 +0000, Ian Goddard
>>> <goddai01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Bhoggatt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> >> On Nov 29, 6:22 am, Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >>> In message of 29 Nov, Bhogg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Mr. Alciere:
>>> >>>> Please explain your method of taking copyrighted information
>> without
>>> >>>> permission from other websites.
>>> >>> I am reasonably sure that in most countries data is not
>> copywrightable,
>>> >>> only the method of presentation is.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In any case the must more serious problem with this sort of data
>> is its
>>> >>> veracity: what information is given about the reproducible
>> sources of
>>> >>> the data? The average website has no such information, so is
>> worthless.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Tim Powys-Lybbe
>> t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>> For a miscellany of bygones:http://powys.org/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I beg to differ. The presentation on the web is the coyrightable
>>> >> component. Scraping web sites and not producing it from your own
>>> >> sources is a violation and often times the reason that many
>>> >> researchers stop providing information.
>>> >
>>> >For one thing the OP wasn't about scraping websites, it was about
>>> >uploading of original transcripts.
>>> >
>>> >And for another, anyone who wants to publish but not have what he
>>> >published used by others needs to ask himself why he published in
>> the
>>> >first place. For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
>> it!!!!
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Ian
>>>
>>> People need to be educated about sourcing when they use shared data.
>> A
>>> source is where a person got the data, not where someone else got
>> the
>>> data (except as a secondary source).
>>>
>>> Too many times we find that data we researched over a long period of
>>> time is scavenged by others who show themselves as the source.
>>>
>>> Hugh
>>
>> So what?
>>
>> I have published my research together with sources. I´m doing it for
>> my own pleasure and don´t mind if other researchers are copying the
>> information. Please observe that I said "the information" not MY
>> information.
>> As Ian said: "For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
>> it!!!!"
>>
>> Kurt F
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> GENCMP-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>> quotes
>> in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
--
Stuart
Perth West Oz
To reply delete "nospampls." and ".invalid" from address
Researching - Gregory and Hudson
http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/
|
