Stuart
You can download a demo version for yourself at the URL
http://www.tagslock.com/
and set all sorts of parameters for yourself
...... This will allow you to check its viability etc on your data.
regards
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Gregory" <stuart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
To: <gencmp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: Here's the plan
> Hmmm
>
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:18:36 +0900, <bill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>> All
>>
>> I believe like everone else says ... that information is for sharing
BUT
>> what I am against is using freely given information and then charging
>> for it
>> ! to some unsuspecting individuals....
>>
>> Any info I have on my site which I don't want "nicked" is encrypted
using
>> Taglock pro software at http://www.tagslock.com/
>>
>> It doesn't stop anyone "reading" it but doesn't allow stealing it !
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> PS - No interests or connections to this software at ALL
>
> How about a test of this software. If you would supply your URL I would
> like to test it as I think anything that is visible in a browser can be
> "nicked".
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kurt" <kurt.fredriksson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
>> To: <gencmp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Here's the plan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> "J. Hugh Sullivan" <Eagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:4932a756.3741765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:04:27 +0000, Ian Goddard
>>>> <goddai01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Bhoggatt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>> >> On Nov 29, 6:22 am, Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> >>> In message of 29 Nov, Bhogg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Mr. Alciere:
>>>> >>>> Please explain your method of taking copyrighted information
>>> without
>>>> >>>> permission from other websites.
>>>> >>> I am reasonably sure that in most countries data is not
>>> copywrightable,
>>>> >>> only the method of presentation is.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> In any case the must more serious problem with this sort of data
>>> is its
>>>> >>> veracity: what information is given about the reproducible
>>> sources of
>>>> >>> the data? The average website has no such information, so is
>>> worthless.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Tim Powys-Lybbe
>>> t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> >>> For a miscellany of bygones:http://powys.org/
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I beg to differ. The presentation on the web is the coyrightable
>>>> >> component. Scraping web sites and not producing it from your own
>>>> >> sources is a violation and often times the reason that many
>>>> >> researchers stop providing information.
>>>> >
>>>> >For one thing the OP wasn't about scraping websites, it was about
>>>> >uploading of original transcripts.
>>>> >
>>>> >And for another, anyone who wants to publish but not have what he
>>>> >published used by others needs to ask himself why he published in
>>> the
>>>> >first place. For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
>>> it!!!!
>>>> >
>>>> >--
>>>> >Ian
>>>>
>>>> People need to be educated about sourcing when they use shared data.
>>> A
>>>> source is where a person got the data, not where someone else got
>>> the
>>>> data (except as a secondary source).
>>>>
>>>> Too many times we find that data we researched over a long period of
>>>> time is scavenged by others who show themselves as the source.
>>>>
>>>> Hugh
>>>
>>> So what?
>>>
>>> I have published my research together with sources. Iīm doing it for
>>> my own pleasure and donīt mind if other researchers are copying the
>>> information. Please observe that I said "the information" not MY
>>> information.
>>> As Ian said: "For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
>>> it!!!!"
>>>
>>> Kurt F
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>>> GENCMP-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>>> quotes
>>> in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stuart
> Perth West Oz
> To reply delete "nospampls." and ".invalid" from address
> Researching - Gregory and Hudson
> http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> GENCMP-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
|
