Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Francophone > Re: Deerfield, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 8 Topic 2700 of 2859
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=

by Richard van Schaik <f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 23, 2007 at 09:20 PM

Denis Beauregard wrote:

> Les Anglais utilisaient le calendrier julien jusqu'en 1752.  Dans leur
> version, l'année débute le 1er mars et a un décalage de 10 jours 
> environ, selon le siècle.

 From about 1700 onwards there seems to be a gradual possibility that 
the date is in new style if I read soc.genealogy.britain correctly about 
this subject. Search terms are "messenger style" or "new style" within 
this british group.

Richard

-- 
Richard van Schaik
f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-22 23:09:53 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Mcs <mcsmntpl@[EMAIL P  2007-11-23 21:10:46 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:30:19 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Joe Makowiec <makowiec  2007-11-27 11:54:55 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-23 21:20:44 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:54:09 
OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-26 00:08:31 
Re: OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-25 18:15:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 3:54:35 PST 2009.