Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Francophone > OT Re: Deerfiel...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 8 Topic 2700 of 2859
Post > Topic >>

OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_?=

by Richard van Schaik <f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 26, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Denis Beauregard wrote:

> So, in some places, the Julian year begun the Jan. 1st and in other 
> the March 25th.  But the leap year was always computer in regards of
> Jan. 1st.

In stead of "computer in regards of" it seems better to use "calculated 
with respect to".

Sorry, tried to send privately first as this doesn't belong in a 
newsgroup. But as it bounced and I don't want to spend my evening 
guessing what address could be correct ...........

Regards,
Richard

-- 
Richard van Schaik
f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-22 23:09:53 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Mcs <mcsmntpl@[EMAIL P  2007-11-23 21:10:46 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:30:19 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Joe Makowiec <makowiec  2007-11-27 11:54:55 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-23 21:20:44 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:54:09 
OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-26 00:08:31 
Re: OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-25 18:15:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 4:42:44 PST 2009.