Talk About Network

Google





Education > Genealogy, Francophone > Re: Deerfield, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 8 Topic 2700 of 2859
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?

by Joe Makowiec <makowiec@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 27, 2007 at 11:54 AM

On 23 Nov 2007 in soc.genealogy.french, Denis Beauregard wrote:

> Au fait, pourquoi le 25 mars ?  Est-ce la date la plus petite
> dans l'année pour Pâques ?

C'est la fête de l'Annonciation - 'Lady Day' en Anglais:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annonciation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Day

   The logic of using Lady Day as the start of the year is that it
   reckons years A.D. from the moment of the Incarnation, which is
   considered to take place at the moment of the conception of Jesus
   at the Annunciation rather than at the moment of his birth at
   Christmas.

-- 
Joe Makowiec
http://makowiec.org/
Email: http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-22 23:09:53 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Mcs <mcsmntpl@[EMAIL P  2007-11-23 21:10:46 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:30:19 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Joe Makowiec <makowiec  2007-11-27 11:54:55 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_p?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-23 21:20:44 
Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-23 15:54:09 
OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=E9v=2E_1704_est-il_?=
Richard van Schaik <f.  2007-11-26 00:08:31 
Re: OT Re: Deerfield, le 29 fév. 1704 est-il possible ?
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-11-25 18:15:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 4:38:16 PST 2009.