Re: Feast days

"Richard van Schaik" <f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schreef in 
bericht news:47cc3439$0$20022$dbd41001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Traugott Vitz wrote:
>> Richard van Schaik schrieb:
>>> In germany 1724 it was a mess with states and borders. I wouldn't be 
>>> that sure about being gregorian. Needs to be proven for every part 
>>> alone.
>>
>> See the english Wikipedia, keyword "Gregorian calendar". It says that
the 
>> catholic parts of Germany adopted the Gregorian calendar earlier than
the 
>> protestant parts, but that in 1700, it was introduced in the protestant

>> parts as well. So for "our" year 1724, I don't see a chance that the
date 
>> could be Iulian.
>
> Better is to take the german version, there it gives some exceptions for

> the protestants in 1724. Haven't got the time at the moment to look
where 
> these regions are, wiki is somewhat unclear on this.
>
> Regards,
> Richard
 The question is not Gregorian or Julian but what kind of "yearstyle " did

the use?
Is it the Easter style the new year starts on Eastersunday and not
1januari
Johan