Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, Medieval > Re: SIR ROBERT ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 26 of 28 Topic 22295 of 24482
Post > Topic >>

Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND

by "John Foster" <retsof@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 10:25 PM

Well, yes. That would make Alice's father only 12-13 or so. It needs some 
reexamination. A look by y'all was helpful. Back to work.

DR has 1432 for the birthdate of George Neville. Some rootsweb records
list 
the birthdate of George Neville as 1423 instead of 1433. That would 
certainly fit this birthdate of Alice, but I need to investigate the 
timeline.  That looks no better. I have an alternate birthdate for Alice
of 
c1449 which would help slightly, but not much.

http://books.google.com/books?id=h60DAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR22&dq=george+neville+archbishop+york#PPA364,M1

The Lives of the Lord Chancellors and Keepers of the Great Seal of England

.... By John Campbell Campbell
page 364

Let's see. This book says George Neville was consecrated as a Bishop
before 
he was 25. I had dates he was provided to the See Feb 4, 1458 and 
consecrated as Bishop of Exeter Dec 3, 1458, so he would then be born no 
earlier than 1433 or so.  The date of 1432 or more likely 1433 or even
1434 
seems to be sup****ted.

http://books.google.com/books?id=cNANgxkr5kYC&pg=PA108&dq=george+neville+archbishop+york&sig=YJZE1Eu69dSNMWXSmYk2OktzFtk#PPA107,M1

Anniversary Essays Medieval History by Students of Charles Homer Haskins
 By Charles Taylor

says he became Bishop of Exeter in 1456. 25 years earlier would be 1431,
or 
1432 would certainly fit as a birthdate.
1432-1433 is still the prime birth time.

http://books.google.com/books?id=f9gKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA88&dq=alice+neville+thomas+tunstall

The Publications of the Surtees Society

This mentions Thomas Tunstall who married Alice Neville. He was the son of

Thomas Tunstall and Eleanor. That is OK. Well, that's the same Lord Thomas

Tunstall and wife that I had. Which Alice Neville might be another
question. 
I see no birthdates for Alice at all.

Son Brian Tunstall of Lord Thomas Tunstall is the one who died at Flodden 
Field. I had it that way also. It appears that Brian's sister D_____ is 
another that needs some scrutiny.

(thinking out loud here) I'll set this aside and make a fresh attack
later.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "wjhonson" <wjhonson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND


On May 8, 6:29 am, "John Foster" <ret...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In the same file, I connect here at George Neville but sourcing for 2 or
3
> generations could use some improvement. I need to revisit google books.
>
> http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=utzing&id=I...
>
> http://thepeerage.com/p23.htm#i228
>
> unknown wife of George Neville ("name known but to God and George 
> Neville")
>
> dau. Alice Neville b. c1445 Thurland, Lancaster****re or York****re,
England
> marr. Lord Thomas Tunstall of whom more is known
> LDS FHL AF # 9HH9- 9N (familysearch.org)\
>
----------------
I think if you would examine in detail the life of George Neville,
Archbishop of York and his parents, that you'll find yourself *quite*
hard pressed to force Alice back to "c 1445"

Without this push backward, it might be a bit more difficult to
sup****t the forward line.  So that might be the first place to look
for weakness.

Will Johnson

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to 
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with the word 'unsubscribe' without the 
quotes in the subject and the body of the message


-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.12/1163 - Release Date:
12/1/2007 
12:05 PM
 




 28 Posts in Topic:
SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"Adrian Parry"   2008-05-06 19:06:31 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EM  2008-05-06 15:28:15 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EM  2008-05-06 15:34:32 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
Louise Staley <caramut  2008-05-06 22:50:29 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"Patricia A. Junkin&  2008-05-06 20:31:03 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-06 19:53:46 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"John Foster" &  2008-05-06 22:33:40 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 05:59:23 
Re:Sir Robert de Holand
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 06:10:54 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 06:27:11 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 07:28:05 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 07:29:41 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
Renia <renia@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 23:59:26 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 08:13:34 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 08:38:29 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 08:52:56 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 09:07:55 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 09:10:32 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 10:03:00 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
Douglas Richardson <ro  2008-05-07 12:48:22 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
Renia <renia@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 23:58:00 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"John Foster" &  2008-05-07 15:01:06 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"John Foster" &  2008-05-08 08:29:54 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EM  2008-05-08 18:19:29 
Re: Sir Robert de Holand
taf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:56:10 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
"John Foster" &  2008-05-08 22:25:56 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EM  2008-05-08 20:43:24 
Re: SIR ROBERT HOLLAND
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EM  2008-05-08 20:44:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 0:09:25 CST 2008.